Supreme court of Canada decision on the assisted Human Reproduction Act creates urgent need for action.
نویسنده
چکیده
I wrote an expert ethics opinion for the federal government when the case was before the Quebec Court of Appeal.6 I argued that the ever-increasing ability to manipulate human reproductive material (in pursuit of any number of objectives) raised unique ethical issues warranting federal attention. More precisely, I defended the view that federal legislation was needed “to protect and promote public health, safety and morality for current and future generations of Canadians through the pursuit of ethical and therapeutic science and technologies.”6
منابع مشابه
Implications and reflections on the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Canada’s AHR Act
In December, 2010, Canada's 6 year old Assisted Human Reproduction Act was successfully challenged in the Supreme Court of Canada. There may be important implications for public health and the evolution of reproductive technologies in this country.
متن کاملThe "Supremes" decide on assisted suicide: what should a doctor do?
On June 26, 1997, the US Supreme Court ruled in 2 unanimous decisions that there is no constitutionally protected right to assisted suicide. Overturning 2 1996 Federal Appeals Court rulings that had struck down Washington and New York state laws prohibiting assisted suicide, the Supreme Court rejected 2 key arguments. First, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that the right to liberty guar...
متن کاملDonor Identity Disclosure: Impact and Consequences
The use of donor gametes – donated sperm and eggs – in assisted reproduction is a rapidly evolving practice. As a result, several regulations and best practice guidelines have been developed to ensure the safety and best interest of all parties involved, especially those of the donor offspring. Perhaps one of the most significant changes in Canada was the enactment of the Assisted Human Reprodu...
متن کاملPrivate health insurance: an international overview and considerations for Canada.
Since the passage of the Canada Health Act in 1984 and its prohibition of extra-billing, there has been an extremely limited role for private health insurance in Canada as a mechanism to pay for medically necessary physician or hospital services. In the aftermath of the landmark Supreme Court decision Chaoulli v. Québec, this may change.
متن کاملOregon's guidelines for physician-assisted suicide: a legal and ethical analysis.
Oregon's Death with Dignity Act was first passed by a ballot initiative in 1994, but numerous judicial challenges delayed implementation of the Act. In November of 1997, following the United States Supreme Court decisions in Vacco v. Quill and Washington v. Glucksberg, which left the states' power to regulate physician-assisted suicide undisturbed, the Oregon voters upheld their law. Oregon rem...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
دوره 33 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011